Difference between revisions of "Community Benchmarks"

From UNSW PCSoc Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(27 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 36: Line 36:
 
| [https://i.imgur.com/VOWNY23.png Speccy]
 
| [https://i.imgur.com/VOWNY23.png Speccy]
 
| 867
 
| 867
−
| [https://i.imgur.com/Z35fXPq.png Samsung 840 Evo 250GB]<br/>[https://i.imgur.com/t99wRCL.png WD Black 2TB]<br/>[https://i.imgur.com/yS4E7sx.jpg WD Blue 4TB]
+
| [https://i.imgur.com/Z35fXPq.png Samsung 840 EVO 250GB]<br/>[https://i.imgur.com/t99wRCL.png WD Black 2TB]<br/>[https://i.imgur.com/yS4E7sx.jpg WD Blue 4TB]
 
| 9219
 
| 9219
 
| [https://www.3dmark.com/fs/16061344 11469]
 
| [https://www.3dmark.com/fs/16061344 11469]
−
| [https://www.speedtest.net/result/7723520067.png 50.32 / 1.46]
+
| [https://www.speedtest.net/result/10334304360.png 52.20 / 18.69]
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
Line 54: Line 54:
 
| [https://i.imgur.com/jDraItT.png Speccy]
 
| [https://i.imgur.com/jDraItT.png Speccy]
 
| 651
 
| 651
−
| [https://i.imgur.com/m1p9pYy.png Samsung 840 Evo 250GB]<br/>[https://i.imgur.com/57h4x4H.png Some Seagate External HDD]
+
| [https://i.imgur.com/m1p9pYy.png Samsung 840 EVO 250GB]<br/>[https://i.imgur.com/57h4x4H.png Some Seagate External HDD]
 
|
 
|
 
| [https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/27881136 10610]
 
| [https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/27881136 10610]
Line 63: Line 63:
 
| [https://i.imgur.com/xs8GQzJ.png Speccy]
 
| [https://i.imgur.com/xs8GQzJ.png Speccy]
 
| 1526
 
| 1526
−
| [https://i.imgur.com/C0SbOEG.jpg Samsung 970 Evo 500GB]<br/>[https://i.imgur.com/dKMGBse.png WD Black 2.5" 1TB]
+
| [https://i.imgur.com/C0SbOEG.jpg Samsung 970 EVO 500GB]<br/>[https://i.imgur.com/dKMGBse.png WD Black 2.5" 1TB]
 
| 14113
 
| 14113
 
| 16284
 
| 16284
Line 70: Line 70:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| mozzarella  
 
| mozzarella  
−
| [https://i.imgur.com/HC3Wvw1.png Speccy]
+
| [https://i.imgur.com/f7tWFuU.png Speccy]
−
| 951
+
| 3372
 
| [https://i.imgur.com/onjhVmU.png Samsung 960 Pro 512GB]<br/>[https://i.imgur.com/igiLVkM.png NAS w/ 4x Toshiba N300 4TB in RAID 10]
 
| [https://i.imgur.com/onjhVmU.png Samsung 960 Pro 512GB]<br/>[https://i.imgur.com/igiLVkM.png NAS w/ 4x Toshiba N300 4TB in RAID 10]
−
|
+
| [https://i.imgur.com/GEpR88P.png 21982]
−
| 12638
+
| [https://i.imgur.com/S8QIIrG.png 24007]
 
| [https://www.speedtest.net/result/7695285558.png 856.92 / 935.83]
 
| [https://www.speedtest.net/result/7695285558.png 856.92 / 935.83]
−
|
+
| Cinebench R20
 
|-
 
|-
 
| CharcoalSocks
 
| CharcoalSocks
Line 88: Line 88:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Prant
 
| Prant
−
| [https://i.imgur.com/am8r7JS.png Speccy]
+
| [https://i.imgur.com/LZiFw9a.png Speccy]
 
| 605
 
| 605
−
| [https://i.imgur.com/ND2p17q.png Samsung 840 EVO 120GB]<br/>[https://i.imgur.com/xcPWN6F.png Seagate Ironwolf 4TB]
+
| [https://i.imgur.com/Wv7yK10.png Crucial P1 500GB]<br/>[https://i.imgur.com/eBbijmF.png Samsung 860 QVO 2TB]
 
| 15787
 
| 15787
 
| [https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/28848838 14853]
 
| [https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/28848838 14853]
−
| [http://www.speedtest.net/result/7676431449.png 30.30 / 1.13]
+
| [https://www.speedtest.net/result/10379462000.png 96.88 / 37.68]
−
|
+
| P1 M.2 bottlenecked by motherboard
 
|-
 
|-
 
| joshwason1
 
| joshwason1
Line 150: Line 150:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
−
| Thesabinelim aka Freyadiin
+
| Freya
 
| [https://imgur.com/a/i84rjns Speccy]
 
| [https://imgur.com/a/i84rjns Speccy]
 
| [https://imgur.com/a/v2KrOHa 1217]
 
| [https://imgur.com/a/v2KrOHa 1217]
 
| [https://imgur.com/a/tKAKpzi Samsung 860 EVO 1TB]<br/>[https://imgur.com/a/OuAHs6P Samsung 850 EVO 250GB]<br/>[https://imgur.com/a/PAQHJS6 Samsung 840 EVO 120GB]
 
| [https://imgur.com/a/tKAKpzi Samsung 860 EVO 1TB]<br/>[https://imgur.com/a/OuAHs6P Samsung 850 EVO 250GB]<br/>[https://imgur.com/a/PAQHJS6 Samsung 840 EVO 120GB]
 +
| [https://imgur.com/a/fH7bSS8 17692]
 +
| [https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/34256589 19007]
 +
| [https://www.speedtest.net/result/10458361548.png 52.60 / 18.71]
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
| Corns
 +
| [https://i.imgur.com/WV9htbq.png Speccy]
 +
| [https://i.imgur.com/UCjK3P6.png 3359 (is this right?)]
 +
| [https://i.imgur.com/qjqi9Q7.png Crucial P1 1TB SSD]<br/>[https://i.imgur.com/i890nGn.png SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB]<br/>[https://i.imgur.com/2JI3ltG.png WD Blue 1TB]<br/>[https://i.imgur.com/kiTT78m.png WD Blue 2TB (Partition 1/2)]<br/>[https://i.imgur.com/3G8eeJH.png WD Blue 2TB (Partition 2/2)]
 +
| [https://i.imgur.com/Bqqmudk.png 12737]
 +
| [https://www.3dmark.com/ Soon]
 +
| [https://www.speedtest.net/result/8520259973.png 7.75 / 0.80]
 +
| Cinebench R20
 +
GPU OC: +170MHz core / +125Mhz mem
 +
|-
 +
| PKBeam
 +
| [https://i.imgur.com/xNEQhAf.png Speccy]
 +
| 4675
 +
| [https://i.imgur.com/zK7U9nh.png Intel 600p 256 GB]<br/>[https://i.imgur.com/OvxsvpL.png Samsung 860 QVO 1TB]<br/>[https://i.imgur.com/ORfMFoH.png Samsung 870 EVO 1TB]
 +
| 24288
 +
| [https://www.3dmark.com/fs/25442600 33395]
 +
| [https://www.speedtest.net/result/12982107386.png 924.46 / 44.45]
 +
| Cinebench R20
 +
|-
 +
| Michael
 +
| [https://i.imgur.com/1wjNrej.png Speccy]
 +
| 1257
 +
|
 +
| 7984
 +
| [https://www.3dmark.com/fs/24124334 10579]
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
| Michael2
 +
| [https://i.imgur.com/Gmhyrg3.png It's a 8 core 16 thread Ryzen 7 5800X @ 3.8GHz base]
 +
| 5841
 
|  
 
|  
−
|  
+
| 24286
−
| [https://www.speedtest.net/result/8091101329.png 9.92 / 0.70]
+
| [https://www.3dmark.com/fs/24805556 28839]
 +
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
 +
| Chewbacca
 +
| [https://i.imgur.com/e6MQzQP.png Speccy]
 +
| [https://i.imgur.com/MtCKRpB.png 2643 (R20)]<br/>[https://i.imgur.com/vrzyvKH.png 6744 (R23)]
 +
| [https://i.imgur.com/tekdcme.png Samsung 970 PRO 512GB]<br/>[https://i.imgur.com/ZAlh7F5.png Samsung 970 EVO 1TB]
 +
|
 +
| [https://i.imgur.com/LeiyX4u.png 10951]
 +
| [https://www.speedtest.net/result/10639299537.png 792.87 / 46.82]
 +
|
 
|}
 
|}
−
 
−
== Contributors ==
 
−
<!-- If you contributed, however little, add your name here -->
 
−
* Vincent Chen, Harrison Scott, Daniel Shougam, Inura De Zoysa, Sabine Lim
 

Latest revision as of 14:10, 3 April 2022

🚧 This is a WIP 🚧

What is this? 🤔

Not sure where to put all those juicy benchmarks you run on your PC? Well, now you do!

We're only listing free benchmark tools so everyone can participate.

Currently listed benchmarks:

If you'd like your results on the list, please send us an image/url to paste here! Please also send us an image/URL of your Speccy 👓

(Ideally, you would use ShareX to cleanly capture the window)

🏋️‍♀️ Benchmarks 🏋️‍♀️

Here lie the benchmarks!

Username Specs Cinebench Crystal Disk Mark UNIGINE Superposition (1080p Medium) 3DMark Fire Strike Internet Speed (Down / Up Mbps) Other Information
morristhehorris Speccy 867 Samsung 840 EVO 250GB
WD Black 2TB
WD Blue 4TB 		9219 11469 52.20 / 18.69
YourselfAU Speccy 664 Samsung 950 Pro 256GB 57.67 / 2.99
xbox Speccy 651 Samsung 840 EVO 250GB
Some Seagate External HDD 		10610
1lann Speccy 1526 Samsung 970 EVO 500GB
WD Black 2.5" 1TB 		14113 16284
mozzarella Speccy 3372 Samsung 960 Pro 512GB
NAS w/ 4x Toshiba N300 4TB in RAID 10 		21982 24007 856.92 / 935.83 Cinebench R20
CharcoalSocks Speccy 1103
Prant Speccy 605 Crucial P1 500GB
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB 		15787 14853 96.88 / 37.68 P1 M.2 bottlenecked by motherboard
joshwason1 Speccy 695 Plextor M5S 128GB
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB
Seagate Barracuda 2TB
Seagate Barracuda 2TB 		95.44 / 38.30
terry Mac boi 668 68.78 / 1.13
whorevath Speccy 1690 19090 20282 4.53 / 0.84
Poonslayer Speccy 1678 Intel 600p 512GB
Seagate Ironwolf 4TB 		15133 17213 94.29 / 30.87
Rageof5 Speccy 2785 Samsung 850 EVO 8243 soon soon
Gabehcuod Speccy 1493 21120 26283
Freya Speccy 1217 Samsung 860 EVO 1TB
Samsung 850 EVO 250GB
Samsung 840 EVO 120GB 		17692 19007 52.60 / 18.71
Corns Speccy 3359 (is this right?) Crucial P1 1TB SSD
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB
WD Blue 1TB
WD Blue 2TB (Partition 1/2)
WD Blue 2TB (Partition 2/2) 		12737 Soon 7.75 / 0.80 Cinebench R20

GPU OC: +170MHz core / +125Mhz mem

PKBeam Speccy 4675 Intel 600p 256 GB
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB 		24288 33395 924.46 / 44.45 Cinebench R20
Michael Speccy 1257 7984 10579
Michael2 It's a 8 core 16 thread Ryzen 7 5800X @ 3.8GHz base 5841 24286 28839
Chewbacca Speccy 2643 (R20)
6744 (R23) 		Samsung 970 PRO 512GB
Samsung 970 EVO 1TB 		10951 792.87 / 46.82
Retrieved from ‘https://wiki.unswpcsoc.com/index.php?title=Community_Benchmarks&oldid=767’